Archived entries for UC budget

November 30, 2012

About Proposition 30

Voters in November passed Proposition 30, an initiative that will raise new state revenue through temporary increases in the state sales tax and the personal income tax on those who earn $250,000 or more per year. It was sponsored by Gov. Jerry Brown and is part of the 2012-13 budget approved by state lawmakers.

The University of California Board of Regents endorsed Prop. 30. If the initiative had failed, UC was scheduled to receive a budget reduction of $250 million this year and lose an additional $125 million next year.

Read more on the initiative, its projected effect on funding for public higher education, and arguments pro and con.

November 30, 2012

Regents examine deficit strategies

The University of California Board of Regents, in a daylong retreat on Sept. 12, looked at dozens of proposals for addressing the university’s growing budget deficit, from academic strategies to changes in employee health and welfare benefits.

The retreat, called by board chair Sherry Lansing, was intended to give regents a deeper understanding of the hard choices they may be called on to make in November after voters decide the fate of Proposition 30.

Read the complete article at UC Newsroom.

November 30, 2012

Following Prop. 30 passage, regents approve 2013–14 budget

Gov. Jerry Brown told the University of California Board of Regents Wednesday (Nov. 14) that he hoped to secure more funding for the university but that UC must look for more creative solutions to its budget challenges, given the number of demands on the state.

His comments came as regents discussed, then approved, a spending plan for fiscal 2013-14 that, if enacted by state lawmakers, would provide for modest enrollment growth of California students. It would also, for the first time in many years, put UC on a path toward hiring more faculty, reducing the faculty-student ratio and re-investing in other quality indicators.

Read the complete article at UC Newsroom.

July 19, 2012

Regents endorse state budget amid fiscal uncertainty

Following a somber discussion of the University of California’s fiscal outlook, the UC Board of Regents Wednesday (July 18) took action to help the university stave off a possible $375 million in budget cuts.

Read the complete article here.

Fact sheet: Proposition 30

July 10, 2012

Addressing budget shortfalls

Although UC has taken many systemwide actions to address the current budget crisis (tuition increases, one-year furlough for many employees, administrative efficiencies and restructuring debt, among others), UC campuses have been left with significant budget shortfalls. In fact, while the majority of the actions taken to address cuts in the prior two years have emanated from central solutions, the reverse is now true for the shortfalls campuses are addressing in 2011-12. The attached document details actions taken throughout the UC system to address these shortfalls. This report is scheduled to be presented to the UC Regents at their July 18 meeting.

uc_budget_shortfall_actions

 

May 21, 2012

Regents call on lawmakers to re-invest in higher education

The University of California Board of Regents, meeting in Sacramento May 16 for the first time since 1993, discussed the university’s budget and their legislative advocacy efforts aimed at making public higher education a state funding priority.

Regents, students and other UC supporters have spent much of the week meeting with state lawmakers and asking them to support a multi-year funding plan that would provide UC with modest but predictable increases in funding, including sufficient revenue to avoid a tuition increase in the fall.

Read the rest of Carolyn McMillan’s story in UC Newsroom.

April 18, 2012

Opinion: A pathway toward opportunity

From UC Regent Richard Blum’s opinion piece in today’s (April 18) Daily Californian:

…While there’s still some misinformation being flung about, I suspect most people have come to realize that the root cause for rising tuition at the University of California is state disinvestment, plain and simple. To be fair, the recession has cut significantly into state revenues. Political paralysis has enveloped Sacramento. And a straitjacketed budgeting process has made public higher education vulnerable, one of the few categories that lawmakers have the discretion to cut. Well, it’s time start eliminating the excuses. This is why – speaking as a UC Berkeley alumnus, a businessman and, most importantly, as a Californian – I fully endorse Gov. Brown’s proposed tax initiative.

Read the complete article…

March 26, 2012

Pillars of quality: UC at a crossroads

UC’s strength and quality rest on four pillars:  a stable funding relationship with the state of California; wise stewardship of resources; leveraging of the multiple strengths of the university; and predictable funding from non-State financial sources, including tuition.

Yet the UC Of 2012, despite its many strengths, is at a crossroads, with two of its four pillars proving increasingly unable to sustain the university’s mission and the continuing quality of its education and research.  These issues, presented to the Board of Regents at its March 2012 meeting, are summarized in the short paper that follows.

Read the complete document…

January 23, 2012

UC cuts administrative costs, seeks new revenue

The University of California Board of Regents met Jan. 18-19 at UC Riverside to discuss savings from cost-cutting and development of new revenue to fill a looming budget gap… During the two days of meetings, senior administrators outlined for the board the latest state funding proposal and discussed a variety of initiatives now under way, including efforts to pare operational costs and enhance revenue opportunities from new inventions.

Read the complete article in UC Newsroom.

November 9, 2011

UC outlines state funding needs

OAKLAND — University of California President Mark G. Yudof on Tuesday (Nov. 8 ) unveiled the 2012-13 expenditure plan to be proposed to the Board of Regents next week, outlining the minimal state funding needed to preserve UC access for eligible California students while maintaining the academic excellence of its 10-campus public university system.

The board is scheduled to discuss and vote on the plan — which, if approved, would comprise UC’s budget request to the state — during its meeting at UC San Francisco’s Mission Bay campus on Nov. 16-17. No tuition actions are on the agenda.

Among the key goals underlining the university’s state budget request are preserving academic quality and maintaining access to all eligible California students. Last year the state provided enrollment growth funding of $51.3 million to support 5,121 full-time students. But even with this revenue, the deep cutback in support over the past years translates to more than 24,000 California residents for whom no funding is currently provided.

“The University of California cannot indefinitely cover the gap in state funding of students,” Yudof said. “The state’s failure to fully fund enrollment threatens both access and academic excellence.

“The University of California sets a high standard through our combination of excellence and access. We are working to develop new revenues, including private giving, that enable us to maintain and expand that commitment. But, over the long run, we need stability in state funding to preserve the quality that has made UC an engine of opportunity, social mobility and innovation, benefiting people in every part of the state.”

In the 2012-13 state budget request, the university requests funding of $36.6 million for 1 percent enrollment growth, an increase of 2,100 students.

Also up for a vote at the November meeting are increases in employee and university contributions to the University of California Retirement Plan, part of UC’s effort to address the plan’s unfunded liability and long-term viability.

Building on the regents’ discussion of the university’s larger financial picture at the September meeting, the regents will hear reports on efforts to boost revenue through private giving, enhance the entrepreneurial and product development benefits of the technology transfer program and achieve savings through modernizing and consolidating antiquated payroll systems.

Given the uncertainties of state finances and the current development by the governor of the 2012-13 state budget, university officials are seeking the regents’ approval of only the expenditure part of the proposed UC budget. The revenue component, which would include funding the state legislature hasn’t yet passed, will be brought to the board at a later meeting.

California’s continuing disinvestment in public higher education has meant that for the first time this year students paid more — about $2.97 billion — toward the cost of their education than did the state, which contributed $2.37 billion.

The university’s core funds — made up of state general funds, UC general funds and tuition and student fees — provide permanent support for UC’s core mission and support activities. These include faculty salaries and benefits, academic and administrative support, student services, building operation and maintenance, and student financial aid. In 2011-12, these core funds totaled $6.1 billion, or 27 percent of UC’s total systemwide budget.

The expenditure proposal includes $225 million in cost savings and alternative revenue sources. It also includes $310 million to preserve academic quality through hiring of faculty and lecturers to improve the faculty-student ratio; expanding course offerings and reducing class size; increasing competitiveness of graduate support; extending hours of libraries and other student services; and reinvesting in instructional support, including for libraries, instructional equipment and technology, and building maintenance.

Other areas covered by the state funding request are continued expansion for both nursing and medicine — including establishment of a new medical school at UC Riverside — employee compensation and health benefits, deferred maintenance and building retrofitting. The university has partially offset the proposed expenditures through significant efficiencies and other savings, as well as through alternative revenue sources.

The $87.6 million that the university plans to ask the legislature to allocate for UC pension costs in 2012-13 represents only a quarter of the state’s designated $255.6 million contribution to the plan. Although the state fulfills its pension obligations to the California State University and Community Colleges systems, it currently is not making any contributions to the University of California. As a result, UC has been forced to divert funds from other operational areas, such as those associated with its core educational mission, to cover pension obligations.

 



Copyright © 2004–2009. All rights reserved.

RSS Feed