Latest Entries

March 26, 2012

Pillars of quality: UC at a crossroads

UC’s strength and quality rest on four pillars:  a stable funding relationship with the state of California; wise stewardship of resources; leveraging of the multiple strengths of the university; and predictable funding from non-State financial sources, including tuition.

Yet the UC Of 2012, despite its many strengths, is at a crossroads, with two of its four pillars proving increasingly unable to sustain the university’s mission and the continuing quality of its education and research.  These issues, presented to the Board of Regents at its March 2012 meeting, are summarized in the short paper that follows.

Read the complete document…

Bookmark and Share

January 23, 2012

State higher education spending sees big decline

From Associated Press (via Boston.com):

State funding for higher education has declined because of a slow recovery from the recession and the end of federal stimulus money, according to a study released Monday.

Overall, spending declined by some $6 billion, or nearly 8 percent, over the past year, according to the annual Grapevine study by the Center for the Study of Education Policy at Illinois State University. The reduction was slightly lower, at 4 percent, when money lost from the end of the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act was not taken into account.

The funding reductions, seen across nearly every state, have resulted in larger class sizes and fewer course offerings at many universities and come as enrollment continues to rise.

Read the complete article.

Bookmark and Share
  • Category: FYI

January 23, 2012

UC cuts administrative costs, seeks new revenue

The University of California Board of Regents met Jan. 18-19 at UC Riverside to discuss savings from cost-cutting and development of new revenue to fill a looming budget gap… During the two days of meetings, senior administrators outlined for the board the latest state funding proposal and discussed a variety of initiatives now under way, including efforts to pare operational costs and enhance revenue opportunities from new inventions.

Read the complete article in UC Newsroom.

Bookmark and Share

January 23, 2012

State budget cuts for research universities imperil competitiveness, report says

From the Chronicle of Higher Education:

States have cut funds for public research universities by 20 percent in constant dollars from 2002 to 2010, according to a report issued on Tuesday by the National Science Foundation… The findings in this year’s report demonstrate a continuing trend in scientific innovation. While countries like China and India have increased their spending on technology and education, the United States has found itself hamstrung by a weakened economy since 2008. Adjusted for inflation, the drop in state funds for the top 101 public research universities in the United States from 2002 to 2010 was 10 percent, with nearly three-quarters of the universities losing some state support.

Read the complete article…

Bookmark and Share
  • Category: FYI

January 9, 2012

Statement on Gov. Brown’s proposed budget

Patrick Lenz, UC vice president for budget and capital resources, made the following statement Thursday, Jan. 5, regarding Gov. Jerry Brown’s proposed state budget for 2012-13:

We’re gratified that Gov. Brown is proposing an additional $90 million in funding for the University of California — an ongoing increase that the governor said can be used to address costs of employee retirement. We applaud the governor’s willingness to grant UC leadership maximum flexibility in navigating these fiscal times, and also his recognition that, after a 20-year hiatus, the state has a responsibility to resume paying for a portion of retirement costs.

The administration’s focus on protecting higher education from further budget reductions is a welcome relief, and the governor’s stated desire for a long-term state investment is encouraging. It appears the governor is moving in the right direction after cuts totaling $750 million this year alone.

His proposal is only the first step toward a state budget for 2012-13. We will continue to make the case that public higher education is not a cost but the best investment an innovative state like California can make.

We will continue to seek out and implement administrative efficiencies that already are saving hundreds of millions of dollars a year — savings that go straight to our core mission. We also are working hard to identify alternative revenue sources that could help us preserve quality and access.

Finally, we intend to press forward with the governor and legislature to develop a long-term plan that would give the university much-needed financial stability, help the families of students and benefit Californians in every part of the state.

Bookmark and Share

November 9, 2011

UC outlines state funding needs

OAKLAND — University of California President Mark G. Yudof on Tuesday (Nov. 8 ) unveiled the 2012-13 expenditure plan to be proposed to the Board of Regents next week, outlining the minimal state funding needed to preserve UC access for eligible California students while maintaining the academic excellence of its 10-campus public university system.

The board is scheduled to discuss and vote on the plan — which, if approved, would comprise UC’s budget request to the state — during its meeting at UC San Francisco’s Mission Bay campus on Nov. 16-17. No tuition actions are on the agenda.

Among the key goals underlining the university’s state budget request are preserving academic quality and maintaining access to all eligible California students. Last year the state provided enrollment growth funding of $51.3 million to support 5,121 full-time students. But even with this revenue, the deep cutback in support over the past years translates to more than 24,000 California residents for whom no funding is currently provided.

“The University of California cannot indefinitely cover the gap in state funding of students,” Yudof said. “The state’s failure to fully fund enrollment threatens both access and academic excellence.

“The University of California sets a high standard through our combination of excellence and access. We are working to develop new revenues, including private giving, that enable us to maintain and expand that commitment. But, over the long run, we need stability in state funding to preserve the quality that has made UC an engine of opportunity, social mobility and innovation, benefiting people in every part of the state.”

In the 2012-13 state budget request, the university requests funding of $36.6 million for 1 percent enrollment growth, an increase of 2,100 students.

Also up for a vote at the November meeting are increases in employee and university contributions to the University of California Retirement Plan, part of UC’s effort to address the plan’s unfunded liability and long-term viability.

Building on the regents’ discussion of the university’s larger financial picture at the September meeting, the regents will hear reports on efforts to boost revenue through private giving, enhance the entrepreneurial and product development benefits of the technology transfer program and achieve savings through modernizing and consolidating antiquated payroll systems.

Given the uncertainties of state finances and the current development by the governor of the 2012-13 state budget, university officials are seeking the regents’ approval of only the expenditure part of the proposed UC budget. The revenue component, which would include funding the state legislature hasn’t yet passed, will be brought to the board at a later meeting.

California’s continuing disinvestment in public higher education has meant that for the first time this year students paid more — about $2.97 billion — toward the cost of their education than did the state, which contributed $2.37 billion.

The university’s core funds — made up of state general funds, UC general funds and tuition and student fees — provide permanent support for UC’s core mission and support activities. These include faculty salaries and benefits, academic and administrative support, student services, building operation and maintenance, and student financial aid. In 2011-12, these core funds totaled $6.1 billion, or 27 percent of UC’s total systemwide budget.

The expenditure proposal includes $225 million in cost savings and alternative revenue sources. It also includes $310 million to preserve academic quality through hiring of faculty and lecturers to improve the faculty-student ratio; expanding course offerings and reducing class size; increasing competitiveness of graduate support; extending hours of libraries and other student services; and reinvesting in instructional support, including for libraries, instructional equipment and technology, and building maintenance.

Other areas covered by the state funding request are continued expansion for both nursing and medicine — including establishment of a new medical school at UC Riverside — employee compensation and health benefits, deferred maintenance and building retrofitting. The university has partially offset the proposed expenditures through significant efficiencies and other savings, as well as through alternative revenue sources.

The $87.6 million that the university plans to ask the legislature to allocate for UC pension costs in 2012-13 represents only a quarter of the state’s designated $255.6 million contribution to the plan. Although the state fulfills its pension obligations to the California State University and Community Colleges systems, it currently is not making any contributions to the University of California. As a result, UC has been forced to divert funds from other operational areas, such as those associated with its core educational mission, to cover pension obligations.

 

Bookmark and Share

October 7, 2011

California and Bust

“California and Bust,” in the November issue of Vanity Fair, takes a sobering look at the U.S., state and local economies, with a harsh spotlight on California. Here’s what it says about funding for higher education:

The same fiscal year that the state spent $6 billion on prisons, it had invested just $4.7 billion in its higher education — that is, 33 campuses with 670,000 students. Over the past 30 years the state’s share of the budget for the University of California has fallen from 30 percent to 11 percent, and it is about to fall a lot more. In 1980 a Cal student paid $776 a year in tuition; in 2011 he pays $13,218. Everywhere you turn, the long-term future of the state is being sacrificed.

Read the full article online.

Bookmark and Share

September 30, 2011

University cuts could wound San Diego economy

Public broadcasting station KPBS examines the impacts of California’s budget cuts on UC San Diego and the San Diego region. Watch the video.

Bookmark and Share

August 31, 2011

Education vs. prisons: shifting priorities

The Bay Citizen takes a look at how corrections has taken an increasing slice of the California general fund over the past 30 years, while the share for public higher education has shrunk. Read the article here.

Bookmark and Share

July 14, 2011

State budget shortfall forces second fee increase for fall 2011

UC Regents reluctantly approved a plan to close a $1 billion budget shortfall through a 9.6 percent tuition increase — on top of an existing 8 percent hike for fall 2011 — cost-cutting measures and operational efficiencies. Read the complete story…

Bookmark and Share


Copyright © 2004–2009. All rights reserved.

RSS Feed